Materials · synthesis/04-missing-reviewers.md

# Missing reviewers (orchestrator plan, not yet run)

| Reviewer | Receives | Withheld, and why | Question it answers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employer-claims checker | Revised letter, Corvid packet, posting | The record, because this reviewer is not checking claims about Jordan. The brief, because it paraphrases the packet and could pass errors along unnoticed. | Is every statement about Corvid accurate to the packet, with nothing overstated, misquoted, or misdated? |
| Corvid insider | Revised letter and résumé, Corvid packet, posting | The record, brief, and reviews. A real reader has none of them, and the brief shares the letter's framing. | Reading as Corvid's head of research: is the analogy and the proposed approach sound to an evaluation specialist, and would this application advance? |
| Parser | resume.pdf only | The .txt file, because it shows text the machine may not extract. The record, because accuracy is not this reviewer's job. | What title, employer, and dates does an applicant-tracking parser extract for each role, and what is lost or misassigned? |
| Confidentiality | Revised letter and résumé, record | The posting and packet, because they are irrelevant. | What do the documents disclose about Kestrel, Parcel, the pricing client, or the research assistant that Jordan may not be free to share? Output is questions for Jordan. |
| Omissions | Revised letter and résumé, record, posting, packet | The brief, because it made the original selections and would anchor this reviewer to them. | What true, relevant material from the record is missing or understated? |

Also needed: rerun the factual and editorial reviewers on `corvid/revised/`. The orchestrator wrote the revision, and nobody has checked it.